 |
|
PLAYING WITH MONETARY FIRE
By
Professor TIm Congdon CBE
Edited by Dan Lewis
£10 including P&P
or DOWNLOAD
HERE.
ISBN 9780903499309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background - December
2007:
The Economic Research Council’s latest research
paper ‘Playing with Monetary Fire’ by Professor
Tim Congdon argues that the recent banking crisis is likely
to reduce mortgage availability sharply in 2008. He argues that
banks will want to improve both their liquidity positions (i.e.,
their ratios of cash and liquid assets to total assets) and
their solvency (i.e., the ratio of capital to assets), in order
to avoid a repetition of the Northern Rock fiasco.
In the year to September 2007 new lending by the UK’s
banks and building societies amounted to over £240 billion,
with mortgage finance accounting for almost half of the total.
In 2008 new lending is likely to under £150 billion, with
mortgage finance being two-thirds or less the 2007 figure. Lower
house prices will be welcome to first-time buyers, but first-time
buyers may find it difficult to obtain finance.
Congdon’s paper surveys the facts of the relationship
between the quantity of money – dominated by bank deposits
– and the levels of national expenditure and income in
the 43 years from 1963 to 2006. He attacks claims that the ‘velocity
of circulation is unstable’. He shows that the growth
rates of households’ and companies’ money holdings
over this very long period were similar. The ratio of households’
money balances to national income did change, going up by 2
½ times because of such developments as the payment of
interest on current accounts. But money balances themselves
have soared by almost 87 times and national output by 40 times!
Congdon’s verdict is that ‘the behaviour of bank
deposits is basic to the determination of national income and
asset prices in the UK, as in other economies’.
Congdon’s paper is highly critical of two schools of economic
thought, the New Classical Economics favoured particularly in
American universities and the so-called ‘New Keynesianism’
now widely adopted in central banks. Both these schools claim
that the rate of growth of money (in the sense of money in bank
accounts) is unimportant to macroeconomic outcomes. As Congdon
notes, one message of the Northern Rock affair is that events
in the banking system have a powerful influence on aggregate
demand and inflation. In the paper’s words, members of
the two schools should ‘check the facts and reorganize
their theories in the light of the facts’.
Online payments can be made by credit card in GBP, USD or EUR.
Refund Policy
|
 |